Can quality improvement improve the quality of care? A systematic review of reported effects and methodological rigor in plan-do-study-act projects

מאת: Knudsen Sø.V., Laursen H.V.B., Johnsen Sø.P., Bartels P.D., Ehlers L.H., Mainz J.
פורסם ב: BMC Health Services Research
תיאור: Background: The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) method is widely used in quality improvement (QI) strategies. However, previousstudies have indicated that methodological problems are frequent in PDSA-based QI projects. Furthermore, it has been difficult to establish an association between the use of PDSA and improvements in clinical practices and patient outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to examine whether recently published PDSA-based QI projects show self-reported effects and are conducted according to key features of the method. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase and CINAHL databases. QI projects using PDSA published in peer-reviewed journals in 2015 and 2016 were included. Projects were assessed to determine the reported effects and the use of the following key methodological features; iterative cyclic method, continuous data collection, small-scale testing and use of a theoretical rationale. Results: Of the 120 QI projects included, almost all reported improvement (98%). However, only 32 (27%) described a specific, quantitative aim and reached it. A total of 72 projects (60%) documented PDSA cycles sufficiently for inclusion in a full analysis of key features. Of these only three (4%) adhered to all four key methodological features. Conclusion: Even though a majority of the QI projects reported improvements, the widespread challenges with low adherence to key methodological features in the individual projects pose a challenge for the legitimacy of PDSA-based QI. This review indicates that there is a continued need for improvement in quality improvement methodology. © 2019 The Author(s).
SDGs : SDG 03  |  יחידות:   | מועד: 2019 |  קישור